![]() ![]() there’s no free will, but I’m interested in the outcome of your thinking.How the composition interacts with each other is where “emergence” begins. You may refer to the example where we derive the principle of Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics. It’s just that the math is too difficult. You can derive complicated theories from fundamental theory.So the basic strategy in this book is something like this: Although I’m pretty sure she did tons of research on this one too. And to be honest, what is really fascinating to me in Lost in Math is the level of detail, and that there’s clearly tons of research done. What she talked about in the book, pseudoscience, is like what Jostein Gaarder talked about in the final chapters of Sophie’s World, which is about pseudo-philosophy. ![]() These problems belong to the “important but not hurry” problems. Well, I mean I am interested but not right away. To be honest, I’m not quite interested in the topics she covered in the book. This is a review of Existential Physics: A Scientist’s Guide to Life’s Biggest Questions by Sabine Hossenfelder.įirst of all, Jean-Paul Sartre and Existentialism did not show up in the book. Book review: Existential Physics: A Scientist's Guide to Life's Biggest Questions ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |